Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 360/2011 — Case between Sivasankaran et al vs Premen et al regarding declaration, fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No. 932/2014
Case between Mani.K vs Chandra Babu et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Mani.K, and the defendants, Chandra Babu and Mayadevi, regarding the ownership and encroachment of property. The plaintiff claims to have ownership and seeks a declaration and mandatory injunction against the defendants for encroachments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 110/2020
Case between Nizarudeen vs Oseela Beevi et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction.
The plaintiff, Nizarudeen, claims ownership and possession of property and seeks to fix boundaries against the defendants who are allegedly attempting to unlawfully take possession of the property. The defendants have been accused of causing damage and trespassing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 145/2013
Case between Stephen Nelson vs Sankaranarayanan Nair et al regarding fixation of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Stephen Nelson is the plaintiff seeking fixation of boundary and a permanent prohibitory injunction against Sankaranarayanan Nair and others. The plaintiff alleges unlawful obstruction to his peaceful possession and enjoyment of property, while the defendants contest the claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 791/2015
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
This suit is filed for declaration and partition by Thankamma, the mother of the deceased Biju, against his wife Suja and their minor daughter Anjana. The plaintiff claims a share in the properties and benefits received by the defendants from Biju's death.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 726/2013
Case between Gopinathan Pillai et al vs Sarojini Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, Gopinathan Pillai and others, are suing the defendants, Sarojini Amma and others, over the right of way to a burial ground. The case involves conflicting claims regarding a pathway leading to the burial site.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1162/2015
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, Jalaja, is seeking to declare her easement right to use a pathway for accessing her property and to restrain the defendants from obstructing it. The defendants, Vijaya Kumar and Sheena, have countered the claim, denying the existence of such a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 22/2018
Case between Joy@ Joy Daniel vs Gracykutty George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and easement rights
The plaintiff Joy@ Joy Daniel seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, claiming easement rights over a pathway. The defendants, led by Gracykutty George, filed a counterclaim alleging shared rights to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 1162/2015
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
Jalaja, the plaintiff, is seeking a declaration of her easement right over a pathway and a permanent injunction against Vijaya Kumar and Sheena, who are the defendants, to prevent them from obstructing her access. The defendants are contending that no such right exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 16/2020
Case between R.Bahuleyan et al vs Prasad.K et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, R.Bahuleyan and B.Devarajan, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Prasad.K, Bindhu, Perayam Grama Panchayath, and The Deputy Director of Panchayat, to demolish an unauthorized construction affecting their property. The defendants have constructed a thatched shop without permitted authorization.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1107/2016
Case between Mohanan vs K.Mani et al regarding Declaration, Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Mohanan filed a suit against his sisters and the family of his deceased brother regarding a dispute over property inheritance and rights of way. The defendants counterclaim the validity of their claim over the properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 687/2017
Case between Anuja.S. @ Thanckhi vs Harilal et al regarding Partition
The plaintiff, Anuja.S., the widow of late Sreelal, seeks partition of the property inherited from her deceased husband. The defendants are her brother-in-law, Harilal, and her mother-in-law, Indira, who has a life interest in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 543/2015
Case between Laila et al vs Banarji et al regarding Partition and Injunction
The plaintiffs and defendants are children of the deceased Haridasan and Gomathy, seeking partition of ancestral property. The defendant has been accused of unauthorized construction, leading to this suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 247/2022
Case between Sunil vs Shyamalavally et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Sunil, filed a suit for partition of property originally belonging to his mother. The defendants, Shyamalavally and her children, are the legal heirs of the plaintiff's deceased brother, Surendran, and contest the claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.541/2025
Case between Sujana. A vs Joyal Jacob Sebastian et al regarding attachment of property before judgment.
The plaintiff Sujana. A filed a petition against the defendants Joyal Jacob Sebastian and Sneha Reji for attachment of property related to a franchise agreement. The plaintiff claims financial losses due to the defendants' failure to supply goods as agreed in the franchise deal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 875/2019
Case between Syam vs Bhavani regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves a dispute between Syam and Rugmini as plaintiffs and Bhavani, Rejani, and Thulasi as defendants regarding access to a pathway. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction against the defendants for interfering with their access to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 460/2018
Case between Pushparajan et al vs Sarasamma et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Pushparajan and Sreedevi, are involved in a dispute with the defendants, who are relatives, over a well located on the A schedule property. The plaintiffs claim an easement right over the well, which they have used for over 20 years, while the defendants contest the validity of this claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1014/2018
Case between Sheeja.B vs Aniyan George et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Sheeja.B, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Aniyan George and Moly Aniyan George, who are obstructing her construction on the plaint schedule property. The dispute arose over the ownership and construction of a compound wall on adjacent properties in Kollam.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 775/2019
Case between Lalitha et al vs Omana et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs and defendants, neighbors, are involved in a dispute concerning a pathway that the plaintiffs allege is obstructed by the defendants. The case seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from obstructing access to this pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 44/2015
Case between John Panicker vs D. Thomaskutty regarding boundary fixation and injunction
John Panicker filed a suit for fixation of boundary and permanent injunction against D. Thomaskutty, who filed a counter claim for mandatory injunction. The case involves disputed property boundaries and claims of encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.410/2015
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a property he received through a settlement deed and seeks relief against Kochumon @ Santhosh and others for boundary fixation and injunction to prevent trespassing. The defendants contend that there is already an existing boundary and allege that the plaintiff has encroached on their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 330/2025
Case between T F George vs CSML (Cochin Smart Mission Ltd.) et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
T F George, a senior citizen and co-owner of land, filed a petition against CSML and Kochi Municipal Corporation seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent encroachments on his property during a beautification project. The case involves issues of boundary demarcation and the rights of property owners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 649/2014
Case between Lohidakshan vs Velappan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Lohidakshan is the plaintiff seeking a boundary fixation and injunction against his brother Velappan and his family. The case involves allegations of attempted encroachment on the plaintiff's property and a counterclaim by the defendants for a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 656/2011
Case between Cicily vs The Administrator, M/s Chinamaya Vidyalaya et al regarding fixation of boundary.
The plaintiff, Cicily, is seeking a decree for the fixation of the boundary of her property, which she claims has been obstructed by the defendants. The defendants, including M/s Chinamaya Vidyalaya and others, contest the ownership and possession of the plaintiff over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1099/2019
Case between Antony Varghese vs P.C. Jose regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, Antony Varghese and Aney Antony, are seeking a decree for the fixation of boundaries concerning their joint owned property. The defendant, P.C. Jose, is accused of illegally claiming more land than he actually owns.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 673/2021
Case between M.Subhash Babu et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding boundary, prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, M.Subhash Babu and E.K.Madhavan Nair Family Trust, filed a suit against the defendants, Suresh Babu and Bindhu.V., to prevent alleged trespassing on property held by the trust. The plaintiffs claim they are protecting their rights against attempts to encroach and claim compensation unfairly from land acquisition authorities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 200/2020
Case between Syamala M.P. vs Prabhakaran et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
Syamala M.P. is the plaintiff seeking to fix boundaries of her property and obtain a permanent injunction against the defendants from trespassing. The defendants include Prabhakaran and others who contest the plaintiff's claims on the boundaries.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 297/2022
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd filed a suit for the realisation of money against M/s.R.J.Enterprises. The case was dismissed for default due to defects not cured.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 613/2014
Case between Stephen George vs S.Noushad @ Kunjumon et al regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Stephen George, lent money to the first defendant, S.Noushad @ Kunjumon, for which repayment is sought after a cheque was dishonored. The second defendant, Raju, denied involvement, claiming he was abroad during the transactions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 563/2021
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd is the plaintiff seeking realization of money from M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises and its partner. The court dismissed the suit due to default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.140/2023
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
John.K.J is the petitioner seeking a review of a prior order. The respondents include Sister Vinni Vetkkattel and others associated with health services.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 773/2024
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
C. Baburajan Pillai filed an application for an interim injunction against Nair Service Society and others regarding the conduct of elections and alleged illegal appointments of an adhoc committee. The case involves disputes over the administration of the Taluk Union.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 743/2019
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves Salman Faris as the petitioner challenging an exparte decree against him. The respondents include The South Indian Bank Ltd and two family members of the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.07/2025 in OS.No.491/2022
Case between Nizamudeen vs Blue Seven Star Constructions Pvt.Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The petitioners, who are the original defendants, filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree. The respondent is the plaintiff who has failed to take steps in the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.490/2020
Case between Gopalapanicker vs Popular Traders et al regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Gopalapanicker, filed a suit against Popular Traders and its partners for the realization of money. The court ruled against the plaintiff due to the failure to remit the Balance Court Fee after multiple opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP. No. 81/2024 in OS.No. 743/2019
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
The case involves Salman Faris, who filed a petition against The South Indian Bank Ltd and others to set aside an exparte decree dated 12/01/2023. The petition came for hearing and was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 512/2022
Case between Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Sajeev. I et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd, filed a suit against Sajeev. I and others for the recovery of money owed due to default on a chit. The case involves issues related to the dishonor of cheques and the obligations of guarantors.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 220/2020
Case between K.N. Mohanan vs M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, K.N. Mohanan, a licensed contractor, is seeking to recover an amount of ₹10,00,000 from the defendants. The claim arises from a borrowed sum that was supposed to be repaid but remained outstanding after the cheque was dishonoured.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 586/2017
Case between Jamaludeen vs State of Kerala et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff, Jamaludeen, is seeking a declaration and injunction against the State of Kerala and additional defendants. The court noted that despite multiple opportunities, the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 109/2023
Case between Joji Joseph vs Asha regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Joji Joseph, filed a suit for the realisation of money against the defendant, Asha. The case was settled, and the plaintiff stated that the suit is not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 788/2017
Case between Lali vs Laila et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Lali, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, including Laila and others. The court ultimately dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 809/2023
Case between Biju Jose vs Jose Kutty Thomas et al regarding restoration of suit
Biju Jose is the plaintiff seeking restoration of a suit. The defendants are representatives of the Kottayam Pvt. Bus Owners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 262/2021
Case between M/s. United Electrical Industries Ltd vs M/s.SBL Knowledge Services Ltd regarding Realisation of Money
M/s. United Electrical Industries Ltd filed a suit against M/s.SBL Knowledge Services Ltd for the realisation of money. The plaintiff remained absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 476/2021
Case between Santhosh Kumar C. G. vs Anandavalli Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiff Santhosh Kumar C. G. filed a suit for declaration and injunction against multiple defendants. The suit was dismissed as the memo was not pressed by the parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 134/2011
Case between Janardhanan Pillai et al vs Vijayan Francis et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
Janardhanan Pillai and other plaintiffs filed a suit against Vijayan Francis and other defendants seeking a declaration and injunction. The case concerns the mediation agreement between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EA.84/2025 in EA. 226/2024 in EP. 95/2020
Case between Kollam Janasree Mutual Benefit Trust vs Janasree Sponsored SHG No. KLM/KNR/PZY/14/08 Poruvazhy et al regarding petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The case involves Kollam Janasree Mutual Benefit Trust as the petitioner and Janasree Sponsored SHG No. KLM/KNR/PZY/14/08 Poruvazhy along with multiple respondents. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won