OS. No.490/2020

Case between Gopalapanicker vs Popular Traders et al regarding Realisation of Money

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-03-04

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Gopalapanicker, filed a suit against Popular Traders and its partners for the realization of money. The court ruled against the plaintiff due to the failure to remit the Balance Court Fee after multiple opportunities.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the required court fees after being given multiple opportunities.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the required court fees after being given multiple opportunities.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court procedures regarding the payment of court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Inspite of repeated opportunities were given, the plaintiff is not ready to remit Balance Court Fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Gopalapanicker
Party Age: 78
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Popular Traders
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Roy Daniel @ Thomas Daniel
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Dr.Rinu
Party Age: 38
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: The Branch Manager, Popular Traders

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: V.Vrajmohan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Plaint was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.

Evidence:

Inspite of repeated opportunities were given, the plaintiff is not ready to remit Balance Court Fee. Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification