Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 586/2017

Case between Jamaludeen vs State of Kerala et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jamaludeen, is seeking a declaration and injunction against the State of Kerala and additional defendants. The court noted that despite multiple opportunities, the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint as the plaintiff was not ready to remit the balance court fee after repeated opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint as the plaintiff was not ready to remit the balance court fee after repeated opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee as required.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee as required.
Supporting Evidence
Inspite of repeated opportunities were granted, the plaintiff not ready to remit balance Court Fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jamaludeen
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asst. Executive Engineer, N.H. 744
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tahasildar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer, Kilikolloor Village
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Village Officer, Mangad Village Office
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Sugathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Geetha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nisha L.Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreelatha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for Declaration and Injunction.
Evidence:
hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jamaludeen vs State of Kerala et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jamaludeen vs State of Kerala et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won