Similar Cases
Based on: S.T. No. 260/2019 — Case between Edwin Charlas vs Martin P regarding U/s. 138 of N.I Act.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
S.T. No.40/2021
Case between M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. vs Jayaprakash regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. is the complainant represented by its authorized officer Sri. M.G. Sunil Kumar. The accused, Jayaprakash, was acquitted in relation to a case under U/s. 138 of the N.I. Act due to a settlement.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No. 46/2023
Case between Eravipuram Assembly Mandalam Residents Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. vs Jasmin Shahar regarding U/s. 138 of N.I Act.
The case involves a complaint filed by Eravipuram Assembly Mandalam Residents Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. against Jasmin Shahar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled between the parties, and the complainant has withdrawn the complaint.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No. 150/2019
Case between Ahinas Nazar vs Shibu regarding U/s. 138 of N.I Act.
The complainant is Ahinas Nazar, owner of M/s. Royal Paper Distributors, and the accused is Shibu, owner of M/s. Smart Papers and Office Stationary. The case involves a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
S.T. No. 219/2019
Case between Edwin Charlas vs Martin P regarding Offense under N.I Act.
The complainant Edwin Charlas filed a case against the accused Martin P under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case concerns a financial dispute related to a cheque dishonor.
Criminal Case
ST.No. 60/2020
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
R. Sreekumar, the complainant, alleged that Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran, the accused, failed to repay a cheque amounting to Rupees Eight lakhs. The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 171/2019
Case between Legendary Distributers vs Asfal regarding cheque dishonor.
The complainant, Legendary Distributers, alleged that the accused, Asfal, failed to pay for goods purchased and issued cheques that were dishonored. The court found the accused not guilty of the offence.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No. 152/2019
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Ltd. vs Syam Prasanth.S regarding U/s. 138 of N.I Act.
The complainant, Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Ltd., represented by M.G.Sunil Kumar, filed a case against the accused Syam Prasanth.S under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, leading to the withdrawal of the complaint and acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No. 235/2019
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Ltd. vs Muneera Beevi.S regarding offense under N.I Act.
This case involves Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Ltd. as the complainant and Muneera Beevi.S as the accused. The matter pertains to an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No.44/2021
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Smt. Anithakumary regarding u/s. 138 N.I. Act
M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd, represented by its authorized officer Sri. M.G. Sunil Kumar, initiated proceedings against Smt. Anithakumary regarding an offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was acquitted in this case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 417/2019
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Sureshkumar regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd, filed a complaint against the accused Sureshkumar for dishonor of cheques issued for payment of a legally enforceable debt. The court found the accused guilty and sentenced him accordingly.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 136/2015
Case between Muhammed Kabeer vs Abdul Azeez regarding permission to withdraw complaint
The complainant, Muhammed Kabeer, sought to withdraw the complaint against the respondent, Abdul Azeez. The court granted permission to withdraw the complaint, resulting in the acquittal of the accused under Section 257 CRPC.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 195/2017
Case between Muhammad Ali vs Salim. A.K regarding null
Muhammad Ali is the petitioner in this case, represented through the Police Station Officer. The respondent is Salim. A.K.
Criminal Case
ST 146/2015
Case between Sainudheen Manakkattil vs Ali Areekkal regarding Offence punishable under 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
The case involves Sainudheen Manakkattil, the petitioner, against Ali Areekkal, the respondent. It is regarding an offence punishable under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
ST. 20/2025
Case between Sree Guruvayoorappan Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. vs Sujeesh regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant is Sree Guruvayoorappan Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. and the accused is Sujeesh. The matter has been settled and the accused is acquitted.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST. 31/2023
Case between Sri. Gokulam Chits and Finance Ltd vs Ammad regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Sri. Gokulam Chits and Finance Ltd is the complainant represented by P. K. Sudheesh Kumar. The case involves accusations under the Negotiable Instruments Act, but it was settled with the cheque amount received by the complainant.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 300180/2020
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Rubina Salim regarding negotiation under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was later withdrawn and the accused was acquitted.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 90/2021
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Anakha S S regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. is the complainant against Anakha S S for a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant requested to withdraw the complaint, and the accused has been acquitted.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.89/2021
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co(P)Ltd vs Sreenath K R regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant is M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co(P)Ltd represented by K R Sibu. The case involves allegations under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was ultimately withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 28/2022
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Jojomon Xavier regarding withdrawal of complaint
Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. filed a petition to withdraw the complaint against Jojomon Xavier. The court granted permission for the withdrawal and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 300186/2020
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Reenamol regarding complaint withdrawal
Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. is the complainant who filed a petition to withdraw the complaint. The court granted permission for the withdrawal, and the accused was acquitted.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 53/2021
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Jolly Mohanan regarding complaint withdrawal
Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Jolly Mohanan under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant applied to withdraw the complaint, and permission was granted.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T.11/2021
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Arun Joseph regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Arun Joseph for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant later withdrew the complaint.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 177/2020
Case between M/s Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mrs. Sherly Baburaj regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
M/s Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. filed a complaint alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant later filed a petition to withdraw the complaint.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.29/2023
Case between Finvent Finance and Investment limited vs Vineetha Vijayakumar regarding withdrawal of complaint.
Finvent Finance and Investment limited filed a complaint against Vineetha Vijayakumar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties have settled the matter, and the complaint has been withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.43/2022
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd vs Biju Divakaran regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd, filed a complaint against the accused, Biju Divakaran, under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter has been settled, and the complaint has been withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.18/2021
Case between Finvent Finance and Investment Ltd vs Vibin Rajan regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Finvent Finance and Investment Ltd is the complainant represented by its Legal Manager. Vibin Rajan is the accused in this case under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.43/2023
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co (P)Ltd vs Deepak Mohanan regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant is M/s. Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co (P)Ltd represented by K R Shibu, who filed a complaint against Deepak Mohanan for an offence under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled between both parties leading to the dismissal of the complaint.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. 44/2022
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd vs Sruthi S R regarding Offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd, filed a case against the accused, Sruthi S R, for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and the complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. 57/2019
Case between Finvent Finance and Investment Ltd vs M/s. Jancymol Joseph regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, Finvent Finance and Investment Ltd, filed a petition regarding an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was resolved and the complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.57/2022
Case between Srambikkal Finance & Chitty Funds vs Jomon Philip regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, Srambikkal Finance & Chitty Funds, represented by its proprietor Biju John, filed a complaint against the accused, Jomon Philip, under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court permitted the withdrawal of the complaint, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.17/2021
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd vs Binil Babu regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
This case involves Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd as the complainant and Binil Babu as the accused. The matter pertains to an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.46/2020
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co (P)Ltd vs Mr. Sreeja J Nair regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
M/s. Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co (P)Ltd filed a complaint against Mr. Sreeja J Nair under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and the complaint was withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.25/2022
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd vs Kanakarani Mani regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd, represented by Manager Mr. John Mathai, accused Kanakarani Mani of an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled and the complaint was dismissed.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.13/2023
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credit Ltd vs Remya Arumugham regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credit Ltd filed a complaint against Remya Arumugham for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was eventually settled, and the complaint was withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.41/2020
Case between M/s. Ceyenar Chemiclas Pvt.Ltd vs M/s Mariya Plast et al regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, M/s. Ceyenar Chemiclas Pvt.Ltd, filed a complaint against M/s Mariya Plast and its partners for an alleged offence under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and the complaint was withdrawn.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.35/2022
Case between Goodwill Chitty Funds vs P. A. Joseph regarding acquittal under Section 257 CrPC.
Goodwill Chitty Funds, represented by Jaymol N.V., filed a withdrawal petition against P. A. Joseph. The court allowed the withdrawal and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.91/2023
Case between M/s Highrange Foods (P) Ltd et al vs Mohammed Asif regarding U/s 138, 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, M/s Highrange Foods (P) Ltd, filed a case against the accused, Mohammed Asif, regarding an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant failed to appear for the hearing, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.10/2023
Case between Amakkattu Finance vs Soudaminiyamma B. regarding withdrawal of petition.
Amakkattu Finance, represented by A.C. Ninan, filed a withdrawal petition against Soudaminiyamma B. The court allowed the petition and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.19/2023
Case between Aitia Infotech Pvt Ltd vs BECTS Global Pvt Ltd et al regarding U/s 138, 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant, Aitia Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a case against BECTS Global Pvt Ltd and Thomas K.M. under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case was heard on August 1, 2025, where the complainant was absent.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.18/2021
Case between M/s Kulathunkal Chits Pvt Ltd vs Augustine George regarding withdrawal of petition.
M/s Kulathunkal Chits Pvt Ltd filed a withdrawal petition against Augustine George. The court allowed the withdrawal, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T.12/2022
Case between Goodwill Chittty Funds vs Suja Joseph regarding withdrawal petition.
Goodwill Chittty Funds, represented by Ujin George, filed a withdrawal petition against accused Suja Joseph. The court allowed the request and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 11/2021
Case between Gentleman Finance Partnership vs Shibu C.M. regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Gentleman Finance Partnership filed a complaint against Shibu C.M. regarding a cheque bounce under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and a withdrawal petition was filed.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST No. 4529/2022
Case between Gentleman Chitts Funds Co India Pvt Ltd vs Bessy siby regarding trial and disposal.
The case involves Gentleman Chitts Funds Co India Pvt Ltd as the petitioner and Bessy siby as the respondent regarding trial and disposal of the case. The order transfers the case for further proceedings.
Criminal Case
ST No. 3389/2023
Case between Gentleman Chitt Funds Co India Pvt Ltd vs Akil Pushkaran regarding trial and disposal.
The case involves a petitioner, Gentleman Chitt Funds Co India Pvt Ltd, represented by its Legal Manager, against the respondent, Akil Pushkaran. It is about the trial and disposal of the matter transferred to Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Vaikom.
Criminal Case
OS. No. 297/2022
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd filed a suit for the realisation of money against M/s.R.J.Enterprises. The case was dismissed for default due to defects not cured.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 563/2021
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd is the plaintiff seeking realization of money from M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises and its partner. The court dismissed the suit due to default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.140/2023
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
John.K.J is the petitioner seeking a review of a prior order. The respondents include Sister Vinni Vetkkattel and others associated with health services.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 773/2024
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
C. Baburajan Pillai filed an application for an interim injunction against Nair Service Society and others regarding the conduct of elections and alleged illegal appointments of an adhoc committee. The case involves disputes over the administration of the Taluk Union.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won