Case Summary
The complainant, M/s Highrange Foods (P) Ltd, filed a case against the accused, Mohammed Asif, regarding an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant failed to appear for the hearing, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted as the complainant was absent and did not represent the case. The bail bond of the accused was cancelled and he was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
The complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Complainant absent. No representation. Accused represented. Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Highrange Foods (P) Ltd
- Relation
- Rep. By Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Asif
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Anish Kumar V. V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sony Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Evidence:
Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act