Case Summary
The complainant, Aitia Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a case against BECTS Global Pvt Ltd and Thomas K.M. under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case was heard on August 1, 2025, where the complainant was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the absence of the complainant and their lack of readiness to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant did not appear and was not ready to present evidence.
The complainant did not appear and was not ready to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant did not appear and was not ready to present evidence.
The complainant did not appear and was not ready to present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant absent. No representation. Accused present. Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence. Hence accused are acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aitia Infotech Pvt Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- BECTS Global Pvt Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas K.M.
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sebin Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D. Muraleedhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused are acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Evidence:
Hence accused are acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act