Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T.41/2020

Case between M/s. Ceyenar Chemiclas Pvt.Ltd vs M/s Mariya Plast et al regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-11-17
Duration
Case Code No.
41
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, M/s. Ceyenar Chemiclas Pvt.Ltd, filed a complaint against M/s Mariya Plast and its partners for an alleged offence under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, and the complaint was withdrawn.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acquitted the accused under section 280 as the complainant withdrew the complaint. The non-bailable warrant was also recalled.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused under section 280 as the complainant withdrew the complaint. The non-bailable warrant was also recalled.
Key Reasoning:
The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant.
Why Defendant Won:
The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant.
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled. Hence complaint is withdrawn.

Judgment Evidence:

Acquitted u/s.280 of BNSS 2023. Hence complaint is withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Ceyenar Chemiclas Pvt.Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Mariya Plast
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vallachirakkaran Jacob Raphael
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Raphael
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Raphael
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayakrishanan R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Blesson G Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
complaint is withdrawn
Evidence:
Matter settled. Hence complaint is withdrawn.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Finvent Finance and Investment Ltd vs Vibin Rajan regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Finvent Finance and Investment limited vs Vineetha Vijayakumar regarding withdrawal of complaint.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V, KOTTAYAM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd vs Biju Divakaran regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V, KOTTAYAM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Arun Joseph regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V, KOTTAYAM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co(P)Ltd vs Sreenath K R regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V, KOTTAYAM
Criminal Case Defendant Won