Case Summary
This case involves Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd as the complainant and Binil Babu as the accused. The matter pertains to an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the complaint as withdrawn after the matter was settled.
Key Reasoning:
The matter was settled and the complaint was withdrawn.
The matter was settled and the complaint was withdrawn.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The matter settled and the complainant filed a petition to withdraw.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binil Babu
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nithin M.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajin Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.
Evidence:
Complainant filed petition to withdrawn under section 280 BNSS. Matter settled.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2021
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act