Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2024 — Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 28/2025
Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiff, Tharavattath Mariyam, seeks a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed into the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims that they caused damage to the Srambi building managed by the committee, which includes the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 6/2023
Case between KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI vs GIRIJA et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, GIRIJA and V. K. JITHESH KUMAR, to prevent them from trespassing on her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 54/2023
Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing into his property. The defendants have allegedly attempted to alter the nature of the property by cutting a road.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 132/2024
Case between SHINIL @ DEVASYA @ SHINIL JOSE vs SHEEBA @ MARIYAM @ SHEEBA THOMAS et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Shinil Jose as the plaintiff claiming that the defendants trespassed into his property and threatened him, affecting his peaceful life. The plaintiff seeks a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 11/2025
Case between BUSHARA vs MUHAMMAD ASHRAF regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
BUSHARA instituted this suit against MUHAMMAD ASHRAF to seek a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining him from trespassing into her property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant threatened her and her family over alleged money transactions with her husband, who is abroad.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 123/2023
Case between P. Leela vs P. Narayan Nambiar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves P. Leela and Padmanabhan Nambiar as plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against P. Narayan Nambiar, the defendant, to prevent trespassing and reducing the width of a road. The defendant has also filed a counterclaim for mandatory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 108/2025
Case between Natol Kumaran vs Natol Chandran regarding injunction for temple festival management.
Natol Kumaran, the petitioner, seeks an injunction against Natol Chandran, the first respondent, to prevent him from causing disturbances in the management of temple festivals. The dispute arises from their familial rights and responsibilities regarding the temple and its activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 34/2025
Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Souda, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from trespassing and altering the boundaries of her property. The case revolves around the defendants' alleged encroachment on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 48/2024
Case between Sujith Thachanandiyil vs Rajeesh. E. K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith Thachanandiyil, claims ownership and peaceful possession of a property and seeks an injunction against the defendants, Rajeesh. E. K, Narayani, and Subija, who allegedly trespassed and attempted to dismantle property barriers. The defendants assert they have a right of way through the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 31/2025
Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
The plaintiff, KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA, filed a petition against MINI seeking an injunction to prevent her from trespassing and demolishing a shop building on the plaint schedule property. The case involves disputes over property ownership and possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, claims ownership of a property that the defendants trespassed into, causing damage and distress. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further trespassing and damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 460 / 2020
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction
The case involves Shajahan TP as the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were absent during the hearings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 233/2024
Case between Snehaja PV vs Syam Sachith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Snehaja PV filed a suit against her brother Syam Sachith seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent him from obstructing her access to their shared property. The court found that the defendant had been obstructing the plaintiff and imposed a decree in her favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 45/2021
Case between Premarajan K.N. vs Jiji P. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Premarajan K.N., is seeking relief against defendants Jiji P. and Anujith Ramachandran for alleged invasion of privacy through the installation of CCTV cameras. The defendants have been accused of causing the plaintiff irreparable harm by surveilling him and his family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 / 2023
Case between Geetha KP vs Ramesh Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Geetha KP, filed a suit against the defendants, Ramesh Babu, Valsan, Ravi, and Surendran K, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on her property and committing acts of waste. The defendants had previously threatened the plaintiff and her husband while attempting to dig on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.102/2021
Case between TP Roopesh et al vs Prameela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
TP Roopesh and NP Anusooya are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against their neighbors, Prameela and Krishna Kumar, for illegal construction on adjacent property. The defendants have violated building rules, causing inconvenience to the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 41/2017
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Shiji.M filed a suit against Hassan Haji and others seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and unauthorized construction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 174/2020
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Abdul Manzoor.P.P filed a suit against Edathil Balan and others for a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from changing the nature of a road that provides access to his property. The defendants were attempting to encroach upon this road, which is vital for access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 616/2019
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Perikkathra Surendran, a retired civil contractor, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for obstructing construction on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him and his son, assaulted them, and unlawfully impeded construction activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.226/2024
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Rosemary is the plaintiff claiming permanent prohibitory injunction against her brother George. The case revolves around the ownership and potential trespassing of the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.780/2024
Case between Muhammed Rasikh.T.P vs Abdul Razak @ Bichu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Muhammed Rasikh.T.P is the plaintiff who is claiming ownership and possession of a property, while Abdul Razak and Sareena are the defendants accused of trespassing and attempting to construct a way through the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.92/2024
Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K.C.Chandran and B.K.Vasanthakumari, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sudha and Akhil, to prevent them from obstructing access to their property and from damaging a water meter. The defendants have remained exparte throughout the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 141/2018
Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs Madhavi, Ajitha, Ajayan, Anitha, Ashalatha, and Amitha are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Ragini, Rahul, Rekha, and others to prevent trespass on their property. The case revolves around property rights and possession over the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 494/2023
Case between Shajimath vs Jabir et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Shajimath filed a suit against Jabir, Rashid, and Assain seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute involves the defendants allegedly trespassing and threatening to demolish a pillar at the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 118/2023
Case between Adukkathil Moitheen vs Sunil Kumar. K.P, Aboobacker @ Bakker regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Adukkathil Moitheen has filed a suit against Sunil Kumar. K.P and Aboobacker @ Bakker seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendants illegally removed soil from his property, causing damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 69/2022
Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Mohanan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Souda. P.C and Aboobacker. The case involves a dispute over access to a pathway that the plaintiff claims is essential for reaching his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.124/2024
Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Reena and Aadithya who are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent forceful eviction from their leased property. The plaintiffs contend that they have received threats of eviction despite being tenants and paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 658/2018
Case between Angadi Veettil Padmini vs Angadi Veettil Vasudevan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Angadi Veettil Padmini, is seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing a pathway to her property. The defendants are relatives of the plaintiff, and the case revolves around the ownership and use of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 592/2021
Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Raman is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thanka and Abhinand. The defendants are allegedly attempting to claim ownership over the property of the plaintiff, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.386/2022
Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Avaneendhran, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Latha Rani and Nagarjun alias Sujith. The case concerns a complaint filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for trespassing and threatening to dispossess him from his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 594/2022
Case between Sabira. M.T et al vs Sudheesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Sabira. M.T, Sakkeer Hussain, and Kurungott Thanuja seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Sudheesh, Rathi, and Sulochana. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obstructed their access to a public way that leads to their properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 47/2024
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji, allege that the defendants trespassed on their property and caused damage. The case seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 16/2025
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendants due to non-payment of an educational loan. The defendants defaulted on their loan, leading the bank to file this suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS/1136/1953
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
This case involves the petitioners Thondarkulangara Korumbathi and others against the respondents Thondarkulangara Chekkon and others regarding a preliminary decree. The court issued its order on the date specified.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 98/2025
Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs RATHEESH. K regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Manager of Canara Bank, Kuttiadi Branch, filed a suit against the defendant for defaulting on a loan under the PMMY scheme. The court found the plaintiff's claim for recovery of the loan amount unchallenged as the defendant was absent during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 72/2025
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves SYNDICATE BANK as the plaintiff against ADARSH. A. C and others as defendants concerning a civil suit. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 148/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the Decree Holder/Plaintiff seeking execution of a petition against MUTHURAJ, who is reported to be abroad. The petition was not executed as the Judgment Debtor was unavailable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 5/2024
Case between Gangadharan vs Ahammad et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff Gangadharan is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and constructing a mobile tower in proximity to his property. The defendants include Ahammad and Summit Digital Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., who are accused of disturbing the plaintiff's property boundaries.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 16/2023
Case between Asya vs C. K. Sahad regarding fixation of boundary and recovery of possession
Asya and C. K. Sahad, siblings, are involved in a dispute regarding the encroachment of property. The plaintiff, Asya, claims that the defendant has unlawfully constructed on her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 17/2025
Case between FEDERAL BANK vs RADHA. N. P et al regarding settlement of suit.
The case involves FEDERAL BANK as the plaintiff and RADHA. N. P, NANU. N. P, RASEETHA. P. B as defendants. The matter has been settled.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 26/2013
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Kuttiyil Pocker et al regarding dismissal of suit due to abatement.
The plaintiff, Meenakshi Amma, filed a suit against defendants including Kuttiyil Pocker and others. The court found that the plaintiff had expired and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won