Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 110 / 2022 — Case between Roopa Narayan Misra vs Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 521/2009
Case between The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple, represented by Baburajan. V. vs Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji et al regarding dismissal for default.
The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple is the plaintiff represented by Baburajan. V., and the defendants include Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji and others. The case was dismissed for default as the counsel was not aware of the listing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.104/2022
Case between Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram et al vs Kuruppathodi Dinesh regarding dismissal for default.
This case involves Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram as the plaintiff and Kuruppathodi Dinesh as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No : 222/2016
Case between Raghuveer vs Sree Vettakkorumakan Kshethram et al regarding mandatory injunction and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff Raghuveer has sued for a mandatory and prohibitory injunction concerning the use of a property pathway, which he claims is essential for accessing his owned properties. The defendants include a temple and its management board, which assert that the plaintiff has no legal right over the disputed pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 242/2020
Case between Edoli Pankajam vs Pulparambil Aneesh, Ralanth Kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Edoli Pankajam, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants, Pulparambil Aneesh and Ralanth Kumar, regarding a property related to the Poloor Subramania Temple. The defendants, a committee associated with the temple, argue that the suit lacks necessary parties and is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 771/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
This case involves a suit filed by Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha and Ramesan G against Tripunithura Municipality. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, which resulted in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1437/2019
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs are Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom and its Bharana Samithi, while the defendant is Jaya Gireesh. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' repeated absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1263/2017
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
The plaintiff, Aiswarya Renjith, was absent along with her counsel during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit due to non-prosecution since no proof affidavits or applications were filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1298/2022
Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
The case involves P.G. Victor as the plaintiff and Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple as the defendant. The court delivered a judgment approving a mediation report between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1484/2022
Case between Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
This case involves Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple and its representatives against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1369/2023
Case between Rajan.K. vs Syamakumar et al regarding dismissal as not pressed
The plaintiff, Rajan.K., representing the Idiyadikode Bhagavathi Temple Trust, filed a suit against Syamakumar and Rajakumar, who are members of the same trust. The court ultimately dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1895/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom vs S.Venugopal regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves a suit filed by Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom against S.Venugopal. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.684/2019
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust vs Government of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit
The case involves the Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust as the plaintiff against the Government of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.470/2024
Case between Chempazhanthy Asharivilakam Sree Bhadrakalimandramoorthy Temple Family Trust et al vs Kuttan Asari et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs, represented by their Secretary Sukumaran Asari, are a temple family trust. The case involved a suit that was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs and lack of action to summon the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 428/2021
Case between Sarath K.S. vs Kozhikode Sri. Kanchi Kamakshi Amman Temple et al regarding suit dismissal.
Sarath K.S. filed a suit against Kozhikode Sri. Kanchi Kamakshi Amman Temple and its committee members. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
EP 372/2022 in OS 550/2004
Case between Manathanath Kodavachalil Janardhanan Nair vs Iringadan Palli Sree Mahavishnu Temple et al regarding transfer of execution petition.
The case involves Manathanath Kodavachalil Janardhanan Nair and Manathanath Kodavachalil Malathi Amma as petitioners against Iringadan Palli Sree Mahavishnu Temple and several others as respondents regarding the transfer of an execution petition. The court is discussing the transfer of the case to another Munsiff Court.
Execution Petition
O.S. No. 70/2023
Case between K M Chandrabose vs Shivadarshana Devaswam Trust regarding dismissal for default.
K M Chandrabose is the plaintiff in this case against Shivadarshana Devaswam Trust. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation from counsel.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 171/2023
Case between P. S Mohandas vs Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple et al regarding rejection of suit for balance court fee.
P. S Mohandas is the plaintiff against Tappuzha Sreekrishna Swami Temple and other defendants regarding a suit that was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee. The case was finally heard on the 31st of July, 2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.448/2020
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 270/2024 in OS.No.447/2023
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 259/2017
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, represented by the Trust President, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, Baburaj. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 1010/2022
Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
The case involves the petitioners/defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them. The suit addresses a dispute regarding a temple's management and the plaintiffs' right to perform certain activities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.612/2019
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity and others, filed a suit against defendant Priya Somarajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 827/2016
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
This case involves a dispute over the management of Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram between the petitioners, who claim to represent the temple's management committee, and the defendants, who assert their prior authority. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.388/2020
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
This case involves a partition dispute over property following a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs are seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to measure and divide the suit properties as decreed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 146/2017
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
The petitioner Moideen.V.P seeks to set aside a final decree in a partition suit due to alleged non-receipt of summons. The respondents argue that the petitioner was aware of the proceedings and failed to appear knowingly.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 114/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
Canara Bank filed a suit represented by its Chief Manager against M/S U.B. Hardwares and its proprietor. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 152/2020
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith K.M., is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika and P. Baburajan, to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants are alleged to have attempted to construct a way through the plaintiff's land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.169/2021
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Panakkal Mammedkoya, is seeking a partition of family property originally belonging to his mother. The defendants, Fabir and others, have not agreed to partition despite several demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.224/2024
Case between Saseendran vs Sreedharan et al regarding possession of property
Saseendran initiated this suit for possession of property against Sreedharan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, resulting in a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.301/2021
Case between M/s. Konari Enterprises vs M/s.K.M.Traders regarding return of money
The plaintiff, M/s. Konari Enterprises, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendant, M/s.K.M.Traders, following a credit facility availed by the defendant. The defendant has failed to repay the amount despite repeated reminders and a lawyer's notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother, Sangeetha K., filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 349/2021
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
Dayaana K. filed a suit against Marunadan Malayalee and others for damages and mandatory injunction due to the publication of a defamatory news item. The case centers around the false allegations made against Dayaana in an attempt to defame her reputation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother Sangeetha K., filed the suit against the State of Kerala and other officials regarding a matter related to the educational event. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No : 450/2024
Case between Ishani S. Nair vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Ishani S. Nair, a minor represented by her mother Neethumol, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other educational authorities. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO :451/2024
Case between Sravan Krishna vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal.
This case involves a minor, Sravan Krishna, represented by his father, Shaji. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 38/2021
Case between Illath Abdul Majeed et al vs Minas Thenanchery regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, consisting of Illath Abdul Majeed and K. Balaramakurup, are the President and Secretary of Nanmanda High School Society, and they have filed a suit against Minas Thenanchery. The case involves a dispute regarding the authority of the defendant to issue notices as President of the society after resigning from the position.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 163/2020
Case between Chathunni vs Kozhikode District Library Council et al regarding realisation of money
Chathunni, a consulting engineer, filed a suit against the Kozhikode District Library Council and its officials for unpaid supervision and estimate charges related to renovation work at the Mananchira Central Library. He claims to have been entitled to a higher payment for his services but was only compensated partially.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 508/2022
Case between Dileep Kumar vs Sunil kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Dileep Kumar filed a suit against Sunil Kumar for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning a property dispute. The case involves issues of shared property rights and unlawful attempts to access a well.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 564/2023
Case between Arabhi et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
The plaintiffs, who are minors represented by a next friend, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not adduce any evidence and the relief sought had become infructuous.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 588/2018
Case between V. Doraswami vs T. Rajeev et al regarding permanent perpetual prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, V. Doraswami, is involved in a case against the defendants, T. Rajeev and K.S. Ashraf Ali, concerning a dispute over access to a property owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and obstructing access to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.17/2022
Case between Mandattil Bhaskaran vs Mekoth Parambil Vineesh regarding declaration of a false and fabricated settlement deed.
The plaintiff, Mandattil Bhaskaran, alleges that he was misled by the defendant, Mekoth Parambil Vineesh, into signing a settlement deed under false pretenses. The plaintiff seeks to declare this deed invalid and prevent the defendant from taking possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.225/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan vs Pankajam, Radhakrishnan regarding partition.
The plaintiffs are Chandrasekharan, and the defendants are Pankajam and Radhakrishnan. The case concerns a partition of property.
Civil Suit
Original Suit No. 194/2021
Case between Muhammed vs Abdul Rahiman et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Abdul Rahiman and Ameer, regarding access to property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property which the defendants allegedly entered and used without permission.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 359/2024
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
This case involves Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff and Shilpa K. and Rajan K. as defendants. The matter was settled and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 360/2024
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff and Shilpa K., Rajan K., and Sreeja V.V. as defendants. The matter was settled and the plaintiff's counsel did not press the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 419 /2024
Case between Abdul Nazar vs Pradeepan regarding mediation agreement
Abdul Nazar, the plaintiff, and Pradeepan, the defendant, are involved in this case regarding the terms of a mediation agreement. The court has found the agreement lawful and executable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.31/2021
Case between Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) vs Dr.Arshad.P et al regarding eviction and damages for unauthorized use
The Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) filed a suit against Dr. Arshad.P and his legal heirs for eviction from a property after a license agreement was allegedly breached. The court considered the nature of the agreement and the subsequent non-payment of license fees.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.406/2020
Case between N.P.Haris et al vs Achuthanandan et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, N.P.Haris and Sulaika, sought a mandatory injunction against the defendants, which included Achuthanandan and others. The case concluded with the court dismissing the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won