Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 / 2023 — Case between Geetha KP vs Ramesh Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 460 / 2020
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction
The case involves Shajahan TP as the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were absent during the hearings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 233/2024
Case between Snehaja PV vs Syam Sachith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Snehaja PV filed a suit against her brother Syam Sachith seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent him from obstructing her access to their shared property. The court found that the defendant had been obstructing the plaintiff and imposed a decree in her favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 45/2021
Case between Premarajan K.N. vs Jiji P. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Premarajan K.N., is seeking relief against defendants Jiji P. and Anujith Ramachandran for alleged invasion of privacy through the installation of CCTV cameras. The defendants have been accused of causing the plaintiff irreparable harm by surveilling him and his family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.102/2021
Case between TP Roopesh et al vs Prameela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
TP Roopesh and NP Anusooya are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against their neighbors, Prameela and Krishna Kumar, for illegal construction on adjacent property. The defendants have violated building rules, causing inconvenience to the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 174/2020
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Abdul Manzoor.P.P filed a suit against Edathil Balan and others for a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from changing the nature of a road that provides access to his property. The defendants were attempting to encroach upon this road, which is vital for access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.92/2024
Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K.C.Chandran and B.K.Vasanthakumari, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sudha and Akhil, to prevent them from obstructing access to their property and from damaging a water meter. The defendants have remained exparte throughout the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 141/2018
Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs Madhavi, Ajitha, Ajayan, Anitha, Ashalatha, and Amitha are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Ragini, Rahul, Rekha, and others to prevent trespass on their property. The case revolves around property rights and possession over the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 118/2023
Case between Adukkathil Moitheen vs Sunil Kumar. K.P, Aboobacker @ Bakker regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Adukkathil Moitheen has filed a suit against Sunil Kumar. K.P and Aboobacker @ Bakker seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendants illegally removed soil from his property, causing damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 592/2021
Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Raman is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thanka and Abhinand. The defendants are allegedly attempting to claim ownership over the property of the plaintiff, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 594/2022
Case between Sabira. M.T et al vs Sudheesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Sabira. M.T, Sakkeer Hussain, and Kurungott Thanuja seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Sudheesh, Rathi, and Sulochana. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obstructed their access to a public way that leads to their properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 132/2024
Case between SHINIL @ DEVASYA @ SHINIL JOSE vs SHEEBA @ MARIYAM @ SHEEBA THOMAS et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Shinil Jose as the plaintiff claiming that the defendants trespassed into his property and threatened him, affecting his peaceful life. The plaintiff seeks a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 11/2025
Case between BUSHARA vs MUHAMMAD ASHRAF regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
BUSHARA instituted this suit against MUHAMMAD ASHRAF to seek a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining him from trespassing into her property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant threatened her and her family over alleged money transactions with her husband, who is abroad.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 34/2025
Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Souda, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from trespassing and altering the boundaries of her property. The case revolves around the defendants' alleged encroachment on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 48/2024
Case between Sujith Thachanandiyil vs Rajeesh. E. K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith Thachanandiyil, claims ownership and peaceful possession of a property and seeks an injunction against the defendants, Rajeesh. E. K, Narayani, and Subija, who allegedly trespassed and attempted to dismantle property barriers. The defendants assert they have a right of way through the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, claims ownership of a property that the defendants trespassed into, causing damage and distress. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further trespassing and damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 28/2025
Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiff, Tharavattath Mariyam, seeks a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed into the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims that they caused damage to the Srambi building managed by the committee, which includes the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 410/2019
Case between Sangeetha Puthiyedath vs Janardhanan @ Mani regarding mandatory injunction and damages for illegal use and occupation
The plaintiff, Sangeetha Puthiyedath, claims that the defendant, Janardhanan @ Mani, is unlawfully occupying her shop room without permission following the expiration of a license agreement. She seeks a mandatory injunction for him to vacate the premises and damages for illegal occupation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.531/2015
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, P.Premi and Sunila, seek recovery of possession and a mandatory injunction against the defendants, M.Rijeesh and others, who have allegedly encroached upon their property. The court found that the defendants had constructed structures on the plaintiffs' land without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.08/2022
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
The plaintiff, Bineesh, filed a suit against Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair and others regarding access to a pathway serving his property. The defendants were absent during the hearing and raised claims over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.227/2021
Case between T.Sunitha, T Sushama, T Sushitha vs M.Raveendranath regarding recovery of possession and damages.
The plaintiffs are T.Sunitha, T Sushama, and T Sushitha who claim possession of scheduled properties that belonged to their deceased father. The defendant, M.Raveendranath, is accused of occupying the premises unlawfully after the termination of a license agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.35/2021
Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass
Malayil Balan filed a suit to restrain Nikhil from trespassing onto the scheduled property belonging to Balan's son-in-law. Nikhil counterclaimed for a mandatory injunction to restore a pathway he claimed was unjustly blocked by Balan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 229 / 2020
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction
The plaintiffs, Narmadha and others, claim ownership and possession of a property originally held under a partition deed. They seek an injunction against the defendant, Marakkath Lal, who is the legal heir of the previous owner, to prevent trespassing into the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 585/2018
Case between V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed vs Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank regarding mandatory and prohibitory injunction.
V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property and disputing a loan liability claimed by Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank. The plaintiff asserts he never availed any loan from the bank, while the bank claims he is liable for loans taken by a friend using the property as collateral.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 91 / 2021
Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from creating any charge or alienating property allotted to the plaintiffs per a final decree. The case involves disputes arising from a partition suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 354/2022
Case between Sidharthan VP vs KP Manoj regarding mandatory injunction and damages
The plaintiff, Sidharthan VP, seeks a mandatory injunction and damages from the defendant, KP Manoj, for illegal use and occupation of shop rooms. The case involves a dispute over possession of property and the nature of the relationship as licensee or tenant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 41/2017
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Shiji.M filed a suit against Hassan Haji and others seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and unauthorized construction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 616/2019
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Perikkathra Surendran, a retired civil contractor, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for obstructing construction on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him and his son, assaulted them, and unlawfully impeded construction activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.226/2024
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Rosemary is the plaintiff claiming permanent prohibitory injunction against her brother George. The case revolves around the ownership and potential trespassing of the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.780/2024
Case between Muhammed Rasikh.T.P vs Abdul Razak @ Bichu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Muhammed Rasikh.T.P is the plaintiff who is claiming ownership and possession of a property, while Abdul Razak and Sareena are the defendants accused of trespassing and attempting to construct a way through the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 494/2023
Case between Shajimath vs Jabir et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Shajimath filed a suit against Jabir, Rashid, and Assain seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute involves the defendants allegedly trespassing and threatening to demolish a pillar at the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 69/2022
Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Mohanan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Souda. P.C and Aboobacker. The case involves a dispute over access to a pathway that the plaintiff claims is essential for reaching his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.124/2024
Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Reena and Aadithya who are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent forceful eviction from their leased property. The plaintiffs contend that they have received threats of eviction despite being tenants and paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 658/2018
Case between Angadi Veettil Padmini vs Angadi Veettil Vasudevan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Angadi Veettil Padmini, is seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing a pathway to her property. The defendants are relatives of the plaintiff, and the case revolves around the ownership and use of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.386/2022
Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Avaneendhran, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Latha Rani and Nagarjun alias Sujith. The case concerns a complaint filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for trespassing and threatening to dispossess him from his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 6/2023
Case between KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI vs GIRIJA et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, GIRIJA and V. K. JITHESH KUMAR, to prevent them from trespassing on her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 54/2023
Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing into his property. The defendants have allegedly attempted to alter the nature of the property by cutting a road.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who allegedly trespassed and caused damage to his property. The defendants have denied the allegations and stated they are not intending to trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 123/2023
Case between P. Leela vs P. Narayan Nambiar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves P. Leela and Padmanabhan Nambiar as plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against P. Narayan Nambiar, the defendant, to prevent trespassing and reducing the width of a road. The defendant has also filed a counterclaim for mandatory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 108/2025
Case between Natol Kumaran vs Natol Chandran regarding injunction for temple festival management.
Natol Kumaran, the petitioner, seeks an injunction against Natol Chandran, the first respondent, to prevent him from causing disturbances in the management of temple festivals. The dispute arises from their familial rights and responsibilities regarding the temple and its activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 31/2025
Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
The plaintiff, KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA, filed a petition against MINI seeking an injunction to prevent her from trespassing and demolishing a shop building on the plaint schedule property. The case involves disputes over property ownership and possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2016
Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.
Indus Towers ltd. filed a suit against Muhammed Abdul Khadar for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant obstructed their access to their mobile telephone infrastructure on the defendant's property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won