Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No.1924/2016 — Case between Sudev et al vs Shobharani et al regarding FSL verification of signatures
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 216 OF 2015
Case between Subair et al vs Noorjahan et al regarding Interlocutory Application
This case involves a petition filed by Subair and Ayisa Khayarunnisa against Noorjahan, Aboobacker, and Suhara regarding an interlocutory application. The court dismissed the application for default due to the commission batta not being deposited.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 123 OF 2016
Case between Jayachandran vs Mohan et al regarding partition of property
Jayachandran, the plaintiff, filed a suit for partition and separate allotment of his share in a property. The court has passed an order allowing the partition based on a preliminary decree.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 105 OF 2016
Case between Suvahiba vs Ummerkutty regarding partition of property
Suvahiba filed a petition for a final decree for partition of property after a preliminary decree was issued. The respondent, Ummerkutty, was absent during the proceedings.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 308 OF 2016
Case between Kondarath Cheriya Muhammed's children vs Kondarath Abdul Rasheed regarding Interlocutory Application
The case involves Kondarath Cheriya Muhammed's children as petitioners against Kondarath Abdul Rasheed regarding an interlocutory application related to property division. The court dismissed the application due to the petitioners' lack of cooperation.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 60 OF 2015
Case between P.K. Abdul Rasheed vs Khadeeja Hajjumma et al regarding condonation of delay to restore suit
P.K. Abdul Rasheed filed a petition to condone the delay in restoring a suit that was dismissed for default. The respondents countered that the petition lacked bona fides and that the delay was not properly explained.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 18 OF 2016
Case between Kathiya Umma vs Ahammedukutty regarding declaration of document No. 707/1998 as null and void.
The case involves a petition by the defendant, Ahammedukutty, to set aside an exparte decree passed against him. The plaintiff, Kathiya Umma, opposed the petition, arguing that the defendant had no legitimate reason for his absence during the trial.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO: 81/2015
Case between K.Abdul Hameed et al vs V.Aboobacker et al regarding Suit Dismissal for Default
Case involves K.Abdul Hameed as petitioner alleging non-intentional absence leading to suit dismissal for default. V.Aboobacker as respondent contesting intention to delay trial.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
I.A No. 3/2025 in OS No. 87 / 2025
Case between George P David et al vs The Salvation Army et al regarding Acceptance of Photocopy of Documents
Petitioners include George P David, M.B.Thampi, P.J.Daniel, M.D.Poulose, Varghese P.J, K.A.Chacko. Respondents include The Salvation Army, The Salvation Army Association Company Ltd, The Salvation Army Property Company Ltd, Col.Prakash Chandra Pradhan, Lt.Colonel Jacob J Joseph, Lt.Colonel BennyMon, Lt.Colonel Jose Mathew, Lt.Colonel N.D Joshuva, Maj.M.Kanakaraj.
Interlocutory Application
Original Suit No. 337/2014
Case between Muhammed Imran vs Afsar regarding partition of property
Muhammed Imran is the plaintiff seeking a partition and separate allotment of his share in the property. Afsar, the defendant, has not filed any objections to the petition.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 104 of 2014
Case between Yahu Haji vs Damodaran regarding setting aside exparte decree
The case involves Yahu Haji, the plaintiff, and Damodaran, the defendant. The petition was filed to set aside an exparte decree, but the matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 327 of 2014
Case between Musthafa vs Fatheevi et al regarding final decree as per terms of compromise
Musthafa is the plaintiff in this case against Fatheevi and others regarding a petition filed for final decree. The court has passed a final decree based on the terms of the compromise petition.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 284 of 2013
Case between Sulaiman Puthiyil vs Mohammed regarding Interlocutory Application
This case involves a petition filed under the Limitation Act and CPC. The petitioner was absent and unrepresented while the respondent was present.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 149 OF 1998
Case between Vayilisseri Moideenkutty vs Vayilisseri Mammad et al regarding Interlocutory Application
Vayilisseri Moideenkutty filed a petition in the context of an original suit against Vayilisseri Mammad and others. The petition was heard by the court.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 323 OF 2009
Case between Kalarikkal Saidu Mohammed vs Kalarikkal Muahmmed kutty et al regarding relief from exparte decree
Kalarikkal Saidu Mohammed, the petitioner, filed an application to set aside an exparte decree passed against him in a partition suit. The decree was issued due to his absence at a trial due to health issues, which he claims were the reason for not appearing.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 120 OF 2012
Case between Tirur Taluk Thekkenkuttoor amsom desom Ambadi Valiyaveettil Parvathikutty Amma's children et al vs Ambadi Valiyaveettil Sulochana Amma's son et al regarding Interlocutory Application
The case involves multiple plaintiffs and defendants related to an interlocutory application in an original suit. The petitioners are seeking a stay on a final decree passed by the Hon’ble Sub Court.
Interlocutory Application
Original Suit No. 529 OF 2013
Case between Modavangattil Puthenveettil Narayana Menon vs Kuruppath Velayudhan's children regarding partition of property
Modavangattil Puthenveettil Narayana Menon, the petitioner, filed for a final decree for partition of property after a preliminary decree was issued. The court recognized the need for division as per the preliminary decree and appointed an Advocate Commissioner for the partition process.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 343/2010
Case between Puthukkudi Muhammed Ashraf's wife; Koulath, et al vs Puthukkudi Muhammed Ashraf's children regarding Interlocutory Application
The case involves a petition for the appointment of a legal guardian for minor children and the acceptance of a compromise between the parties. The court granted the application allowing the legal guardian to act on behalf of the minors.
Interlocutory Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 12 of 2011
Case between Ayishabi vs Abdul Azeez et al regarding Interlocutory Application
The case involves Ayishabi as the plaintiff against Abdul Azeez and others as defendants regarding an interlocutory application. The petition was dismissed for default following the petitioner's death.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
Rent Control Petition No. 41 Of 2017
Case between Thahira vs Shahid Ahammed regarding rent control issues.
Thahira filed a rent control petition against Shahid Ahammed. The petitioner sought to remove the case from the ready list due to health issues but the court found no valid reasons for the absence.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
OS.09/2025
Case between Aneesha vs Lissy George et al regarding property dispute and interim injunction.
Aneesha is the petitioner alleging unlawful obstruction by Lissy George and George regarding access to her property. The case involves a dispute over a pathway and the removal of soil affecting her property rights.
Interlocutory Application
Partial
OS 439/2025
Case between The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy et al vs Raghu P.S et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy and its representatives, are seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against the defendants from claiming authority over the Samadhi and conducting the Shivagiri pilgrimage. The defendants assert their longstanding role in administration and deny the plaintiffs' claims.
Interlocutory Application
Defendant Won
RCP.No.52/2022
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
R.Vijayakumar filed a petition against Arun Mohan regarding non-compliance with a previous court order related to a rental property. The court ordered Arun Mohan to put R.Vijayakumar in possession of the building.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.60/2024
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
Ashraf Ali filed a rent control petition against Badhusha. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Rent Control Petition
Defendant Won
O.P (Pauper) 01/2022
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
The case involves Sreedevi as the plaintiff seeking money from Mahesh, the defendant. The application was filed for the realization of money, and Sreedevi claimed to be unable to pay court fees.
Application in Pauper Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.183/2025
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
Anitha Kumari.L.K and her children are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Madhu.S and Gangadevi. The case involves restraining the defendants from making constructions in certain properties until a specified date.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2023
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. initiated a suit against Justin.V.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff despite notice.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP. No. 276/2024
Case between Vivek.S vs Meenambika regarding delivery of vacant possession.
Vivek.S, the decree holder, is involved in a case against Meenambika, the judgment debtor, regarding the delivery of vacant possession of a building. The court appointed an Amin to facilitate the delivery.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.182/2025
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M., is seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Rajan, to prevent interference with the plaint scheduled property. The court was satisfied that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won