Case Summary
This case involves a petition filed under the Limitation Act and CPC. The petitioner was absent and unrepresented while the respondent was present.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition stands dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulaiman Puthiyil
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulaiman Puthiyil vs Mohammed regarding Interlocutory Application
Case Code Year
Case between Sulaiman Puthiyil vs Mohammed regarding Interlocutory Application