Case Summary
Case involves K.Abdul Hameed as petitioner alleging non-intentional absence leading to suit dismissal for default. V.Aboobacker as respondent contesting intention to delay trial.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
Petition allowed with costs. ₹ 2,000/- to be paid to respondent before 27-03-2019.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Court found sufficient reason for non-appearance of petitioner within prescribed period.
Court found sufficient reason for non-appearance of petitioner within prescribed period.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Court found sufficient reason for non-appearance of petitioner within prescribed period.
Court found sufficient reason for non-appearance of petitioner within prescribed period.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed on condition to pay ₹ 2,000/- as costs to the respondent on or before 27-03-2019.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.Abdul Hameed
- Relation
- S/o Mayin Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.Aboobacker
- Relation
- S/o Muhammedhaji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.Abdul Hameed et al vs V.Aboobacker et al regarding Suit Dismissal for Default
Case Code Year
Case between K.Abdul Hameed et al vs V.Aboobacker et al regarding Suit Dismissal for Default