Case Summary
Sudev and Resmi are petitioners seeking to verify the signature of the fifth defendant through forensic analysis, alleging signature forgery. The defendants include Shobharani and others, who contest the authenticity of the signature.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
FSL verification of the fifth defendant's signature
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for the signature of the fifth defendant to be sent for forensic verification. The court emphasized the necessity of this verification in light of the allegations of forgery and the pending petition under Section 340 of the CrPC.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that sending the documents for FSL verification is necessary due to the allegations of forgery and ongoing legal proceedings.
The court found that sending the documents for FSL verification is necessary due to the allegations of forgery and ongoing legal proceedings.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that sending the documents for FSL verification is necessary due to the allegations of forgery and ongoing legal proceedings.
The court found that sending the documents for FSL verification is necessary due to the allegations of forgery and ongoing legal proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
This court of the view that it is necessary to send the documents for FSL verification in the light of the petition initiating Sec 340 of CRPC also.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudev
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Resmi
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shobharani
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekantan Nair
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Satheesan .G. Gangadharapilla
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moly. R
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aswathy .M.S
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Manish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ajun Krishna. U.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Request to send the signature of the 5th defendant to FSL for verification.
Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Signature Verification Request
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court has ordered the sending of the signature of the 5th defendant to FSL for comparison.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudev et al vs Shobharani et al regarding FSL verification of signatures
Case Code Year
Case between Sudev et al vs Shobharani et al regarding FSL verification of signatures