Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 323 OF 2009

Case between Kalarikkal Saidu Mohammed vs Kalarikkal Muahmmed kutty et al regarding relief from exparte decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-19
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 07/30/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kalarikkal Saidu Mohammed, the petitioner, filed an application to set aside an exparte decree passed against him in a partition suit. The decree was issued due to his absence at a trial due to health issues, which he claims were the reason for not appearing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to set aside the exparte decree was allowed, but a cost of Rs. 5000/- was imposed on the petitioner to be paid before a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Exparte decree set aside upon payment of cost
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the exparte decree was allowed, but a cost of Rs. 5000/- was imposed on the petitioner to be paid before a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court observed that setting aside the decree was necessary to adjudicate the real dispute and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that in order to finally adjudicate the real dispute between the parties and also to shorten the litigation and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, the exparte decree passed against the petitioner is to be set aside in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and the exparte decree passed against the petitioner is set aside on payment of cost of Rs. 5000/- on or before 30-07-2019.

Parties Involved

Parties

Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the exparte decree passed against the petitioner is set aside on payment of cost of Rs. 5000/- on or before 30-07-2019.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and the exparte decree passed against the petitioner is set aside on payment of cost of Rs. 5000/- on or before 30-07-2019.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kalarikkal Saidu Mohammed vs Kalarikkal Muahmmed kutty et al regarding relief from exparte decree
Case Code Year
Case between Kalarikkal Saidu Mohammed vs Kalarikkal Muahmmed kutty et al regarding relief from exparte decree

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 07/30/2019 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kondarath Cheriya Muhammed's children vs Kondarath Abdul Rasheed regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Interlocutory Application Defendant Won
Case between Subair et al vs Noorjahan et al regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Interlocutory Application Defendant Won
Case between Jayachandran vs Mohan et al regarding partition of property
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Interlocutory Application Plaintiff Won
Case between P.K. Abdul Rasheed vs Khadeeja Hajjumma et al regarding condonation of delay to restore suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Interlocutory Application Defendant Won
Case between Suvahiba vs Ummerkutty regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Interlocutory Application Plaintiff Won