| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2531 - 2535 of 15157

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Haridas et al vs Vasu et al regarding breach of undertaking

Civil Suit

I. A. No.07/2025 in OS No.302/2019

Perumbavoor

2025-12-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mathai et al vs Chinnamma et al regarding Suit for injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No.403/2017

2025-12-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kannaki Viswanath vs Arun Viswanathan regarding Partition

Partition Suit

O. S. No. 152/2024

2025-12-08

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Saarakutti vs V P Peter et al regarding objection to decree execution

Claim Petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC

E.A. 162/2025

PERUMBAVOOR

2025-12-17

1 year 30 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Paul P C et al vs Babu Thomas regarding Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunctions

Civil Suit

O. S. No.392/2020

2025-12-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8163

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

The plaintiff frequently failed to appear in court, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often did not provide critical documents, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not having legal representation present during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

The failure to pay necessary fees or costs resulted in several dismissals for the plaintiffs.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Lack of Representation in Court

Non-Payment of Required Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?