Case Summary
Plaintiffs are Haridas et al living in Aluva Taluk. Defendants are Vasu et al from Aluva Taluk and surrounding villages. The case involves a breach of an undertaking regarding alienation of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Second respondent found guilty of willful breach of undertaking and liable for proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Key Reasoning:
The second respondent wilfully disobeyed the undertaking recorded by the Court.
The second respondent wilfully disobeyed the undertaking recorded by the Court.
Why Defendant Won:
The second respondent wilfully disobeyed the undertaking recorded by the Court.
The second respondent wilfully disobeyed the undertaking recorded by the Court.
Supporting Evidence
The second respondent admitted the violation of the undertaking and the alienation of the property was deliberate.
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haridas
- Relation
- S/o Govindan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subramanian
- Relation
- S/o Govindan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhosh
- Relation
- S/o Govindan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Relation
- D/o Govindan, W/o Subramanian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasu
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Govindan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valsala
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o Janaki, W/o Ravi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N C Baby
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Cheriyan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baiju
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o Sathyavan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Breach of undertaking recorded by the court
Evidence:
The second respondent wilfully disobeyed the court's undertaking
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of deliberate alienation of property in violation of court undertaking
Reference:
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of agreement executed in respect of the plaint schedule property
Reference:
Exhibit B6
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of conveyance of property in violation of court order
Reference:
Sale Deed No. 1114 of 2024
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridas et al vs Vasu et al regarding breach of undertaking
Case Code Year
Case between Haridas et al vs Vasu et al regarding breach of undertaking
Case Flags
Imprisonment Involved
Imprisonment Duration
Proceedings to be initiated against defendants 2 and 3