Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.A. 162/2025

Case between Saarakutti vs V P Peter et al regarding objection to decree execution

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
1 year 30 days
Case Code No.
162
Case Closed
Mon, 12/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saarakutti filed a claim petition objecting to the execution of a decree regarding removal of a gate, claiming it was on her property. The court allowed the claim petition partially.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Claim petition allowed partially by the court.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Claim Petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC
Final Judgment
No
Claim petition allowed partially by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The gate was found to be on the petitioner's property not included in the plaint schedule.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The gate was found to be on the petitioner's property not included in the plaint schedule.
Supporting Evidence
null

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saarakutti
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V P Peter
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gheevarghse
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 3869/2024 of SRO Puthencruz, Tax Receipt No. KL07051404802/2025 Issued by Village office Irapuram, Sketch issued by Village officer Irapuram
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 7231/2013 of SRO Puthencruz, Certified copy of Sale deed No. 651/2008 of SRO Puthencruz

Advocates

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Claim petitioner's property in Re-Survey No.191/10
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment issued by Village office Irapuram
Reference:
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sketch issued by Village officer Irapuram
Reference:
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 7231/2013 of SRO Puthencruz
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 651/2008 of SRO Puthencruz
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission report and plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report and plan prepared at the time of the suit
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Claim Petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.A.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
PERUMBAVOOR
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Wed, 12/18/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Gopi et al vs Service Co-operative Bank No. 2181 regarding auction proceedings
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Case Defendant Won
Case between Anees Johny vs K L M Chits India Ltd. et al regarding adjournment of sale in EP No. 36/2021
THE MUNSIFF COURT PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Pathrose vs Baby regarding review of order
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Malathi Kunjamma et al vs Lalitha et al regarding Amendment of Plaint Schedule Property
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Civil Case Defendant Won