Case Summary
Gopi and others are the petitioners seeking relief related to the auction of a property. Service Co-operative Bank is the respondent as the decree holder in this matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to produce necessary documents regarding the upset price of the property. The court found the current upset price to be reasonable.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to produce any documents to justify their claims regarding the upset price.
The petitioner failed to produce any documents to justify their claims regarding the upset price.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to produce any documents to justify their claims regarding the upset price.
The petitioner failed to produce any documents to justify their claims regarding the upset price.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has not produced documents to record the upset price of the property. Hence it can be seen that the petitioner is only to protract the proceedings.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopi
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vilasini
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bijumon
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Service Co-operative Bank No. 2181
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Maitheen M. Pareeth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. N. Madhava Pai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.A.
Case Code Year
2025