Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.392/2020

Case between Paul P C et al vs Babu Thomas regarding Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunctions

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This is a case between Paul P C and others against Babu Thomas regarding the unlawful and nuisance-causing activities conducted by the defendant, causing disturbance and health hazards to the plaintiffs and their family members.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from conducting certain specified activities in his property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paul P C (56 years years) Puthenpurapullan House, Nedungapra Bhagam, Kochangadi, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Gopalakrishnan K B (53 years years) VNP Vilasam, Nedungapra Bhagam, Kochangadi, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Anil A S (48 years years) Aalappattu House, Nedungapra Bhagam, Kochangadi, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Babu Thomas (47 years years) Nedungapra Bhagam, Kochangadi, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained from certain workshop activities causing nuisance
Evidence:
The suit is decreed permanently restraining defendant from specified activities.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained from constructing workshop without proper licenses
Evidence:
The suit is decreed restraining defendant from constructing workshop without valid license.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff obtained 1st item of plaint schedule property by virtue of Settlement Deed No.3013/1997.
Reference:
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff acquired 2nd item of plaint schedule property under Sale Deed No.3144/2003.
Reference:
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff obtained 3rd item of plaint schedule property by Sale Deed No.658/2001.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases