Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.403/2017

Case between Mathai et al vs Chinnamma et al regarding Suit for injunction

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the children of deceased brothers disputing land ownership rights based on partition deeds. The plaintiffs claim a share of the disputed properties allotted to their predecessors.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit with no costs allocated to either party.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to establish the legal basis for their claim, particularly concerning historical land partitions.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mathai (81 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village, (Old Cheranalloor) Manjusha (38 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Mudakuzha Kara, Vengoor West Village Anju Mary Kuriakose (31 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Mudakuzha Kara, Vengoor West Village Others (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Chinnamma (65 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village Paulvis George V (45 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village Misintha V (42 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village Jeseentha v (39 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village Davis V (37 years years) Eecharamkudy House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought injunction to create a pathway
Evidence:
The substance of the relief sought is to create or revive a pathway which does not presently exist on the ground.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought declaration and injunction
Evidence:
The failure to establish grant leads to the conclusion that the plaintiffs are not entitled to declaration.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition Deed No.3520/1972
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition Deed No.646/1975
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Power of Attorney
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax receipt of Tandaper No.109, Block No.017
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and rough sketch submitted by Advocate Commissioner Hashim Al Thaf
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases