| Niyamam AI

Displaying 416 - 420 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Hamsa vs Musthafa regarding injunctions

Civil Suit - Injunction

Restor.Ptn. 1174/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-27

1 year, 1 month, 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajani vs Saidalikutty et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.250 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-06-21

1 year 10 months

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kumaran et al vs Kuliparambil Velayudhan et al regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 306 OF 2011

Tirur

2017-06-16

Approximately 6 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Shafeekh et al vs Muhammed et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.58 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-06-14

Unknown

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Payyappanda Salgunan vs Kannachampat Radhakrishnan regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 175 OF 2012

Tirur

2017-06-13

Null

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

40%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff's Absence at Hearings

Many suits were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during critical court hearings.

Found in 40 cases (40%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence for Claims

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Represent in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the lack of legal representation for the plaintiffs during proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Procedural Issues

Dismissals occurred as plaintiffs defaulted on necessary procedural steps such as filing fees or requests.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff's Absence at Hearings

Lack of Evidence for Claims

Failure to Represent in Court

Default Due to Procedural Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?