Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction against the third defendant. However, as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing, the suit was dismissed with costs imposed on the third defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Available
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs imposed on the third defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Not available
Not available
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Name of the plaintiff called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed with cost of 3rd defendant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shafeekh
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed Kutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aneeshabanu
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o Shafeek
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o Ahammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raseena
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sidheeque
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shafeekh et al vs Muhammed et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shafeekh et al vs Muhammed et al regarding injunction