Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 250 OF 2014

Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2015-04-08
Duration
Approximately 8 months
Case Closed
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction which was partly decreed based on a mediated agreement, directing the defendant to vacate the property by 31-08-2015.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in part without cost, instructing the defendant to vacate the property based on the lawful terms of the mediation agreement.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Defendant to vacate the plaint schedule property by 31-08-2015
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in part without cost, instructing the defendant to vacate the property based on the lawful terms of the mediation agreement.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the mediation agreement is lawful. Hence the mediation agreement is accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

the suit is decreed in part without cost directing the defendant to vacate the plaint schedule property on or before 31-08-2015.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hilar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. Kunhimuhammed @ Bappu Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdurahiman
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o. Kunhimuhammed @ Bappu Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Abdulkhader
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. M.V. Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Dinesh Pookayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant to vacate the plaint schedule property by 31-08-2015
Evidence:
the suit is decreed in part without cost directing the defendant to vacate the plaint schedule property on or before 31-08-2015.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 08/31/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 04/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Thu, 04/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Ummer vs Sulaiman et al regarding perpetual injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won