Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 40 OF 2012

Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2014-05-28
Duration
Approximately 2 years
Case Closed
Wed, 05/28/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Deepak filed suit against defendant Faizal for perpetual and mandatory injunction, which was settled through a compromise petition leading to dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition filed by the parties, leading to the dismissal of the suit without costs.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not available
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition filed by the parties, leading to the dismissal of the suit without costs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled between parties. Compromise petition is filed as I.A.1316/2014. Since the compromise is lawful. I.A. 1316/2014 is allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the prayer in the compromise petition, the suit is dismissed without cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Puliyoli Deepak
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o K. Bhaskaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thottariyakath Faizal
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise petition (I.A.1316/2014)
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Lilli Kristnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome:
Description:
Suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction
Evidence:
Matter settled between parties. Compromise petition is filed as I.A.1316/2014. Since the compromise is lawful. I.A. 1316/2014 is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Puliyoli Deepak vs Thottariyakath Faizal regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 05/28/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 05/28/2014 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhakkat Muhammed's son llaneefa et al vs Vazhakat Muhammed's son Mijeed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Hilar et al vs Moidukkante Purakkal Muhammad Kasim regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Partial
Case between Ambalakkandi Assainar Haji et al vs Chavadikkunnan Hussain et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Ummer vs Sulaiman et al regarding perpetual injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won