Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction, which was ultimately settled between the parties resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the matter was settled between the parties through a lawful compromise petition.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Since the compromise is lawful, I.A. 821/2015 is allowed. In view of the prayer in the compromise petition, the suit is dismissed without cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o. Saithu Mooppan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kainikkara Abdu Rahiman
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o. Mammi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdu
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhimoideenkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Not applicable
Evidence:
Not mentioned
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kainikkara Muhammad Abdu Rahiman et al vs Abdu regarding injunction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement