Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 306 OF 2011

Case between Kumaran et al vs Kuliparambil Velayudhan et al regarding mandatory injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-16
Duration
Approximately 6 years
Case Closed
Fri, 06/16/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed suit against defendants seeking a mandatory injunction, and the suit was ultimately dismissed without any order as the matter was settled.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed without any order as the matter was settled.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed without any order as the matter was settled.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for mandatory injunction. Joint statement filed. Commissioner filed report also. Since the matter is settled, the suit is dismissed without any order as to costs. Joint statement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kumaran
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karthiayani
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuliparambil Velayudhan
Relation
Children
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meenakshi
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valli
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o, W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kurumba
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o, D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarojini
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o, D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint statement, Commissioner report etc.
Defendants Documents
Not applicable

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction
Evidence:
Suit for mandatory injunction. Joint statement filed. Commissioner filed report also.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kumaran et al vs Kuliparambil Velayudhan et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kumaran et al vs Kuliparambil Velayudhan et al regarding mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 06/16/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/16/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Thekkepeediyekkal Muhammed vs Pulikkal Saidalavi regarding mandatory injunction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kaladi Abdul Azeez vs Kadalambathoor Nanikkutty regarding mandatory injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Areekkunnath Sreenivasan and Dr.K.Abdul Nazar et al regarding possession dispute
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Nambunni vs Vasudevan regarding mandatory injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Aydru Master's children et al vs Saifudhheen et al regarding setting aside ex parte order
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won