Case Summary
Plaintiff Nambunni, aged 80, filed a suit against defendant Vasudevan, aged 52, seeking a mandatory injunction. The plaintiff's counsel reported that he had no instructions from the client, and as the plaintiff was absent with no representation, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and without representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nambunni
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o. Chanthoman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasudevan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Karimbankalayil Raman
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking mandatory injunction
Evidence:
Not mentioned
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nambunni vs Vasudevan regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nambunni vs Vasudevan regarding mandatory injunction