Case Summary
Petitioner Hamsa filed a suit seeking an injunction against respondent Musthafa, where all respondents were set exparte. Petitioner filed an application under order 9 Rule 9 due to health reasons, which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Opportunity to proceed with the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the suit for injunctions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
The court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the suit.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hamsa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Musthafa
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suresh A Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Musthafa
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Opportunity to proceed
Description:
Allowed petitioner to proceed with the suit for injunctions
Evidence:
The court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to proceed with the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN.
Case Code Year
2016