ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 175 OF 2012

Case between Payyappanda Salgunan vs Kannachampat Radhakrishnan regarding injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-06-13

Duration

Null

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A suit for injunction where the plaintiff failed to provide instructions to the counsel, resulting in dismissal of the suit with costs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of plaintiff representation resulting in costs awarded against the plaintiff.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Dismissed with costs

Case Type

Civil Suit - Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of plaintiff representation resulting in costs awarded against the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Payyappanda Salgunan
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o Parangodan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kannachampat Radhakrishnan
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o Kunhan

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Partly Granted

Description:

Suit dismissed with costs

Evidence: