| Niyamam AI

Displaying 496 - 500 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunjimoideen vs Muhammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:26/2015

Tirur

2017-06-19

4 years (originally filed in 2013, refiled in 2015)

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ahammed Navab vs Pattath Nissarudheen regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No. 47/2017

Tirur

2017-06-02

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:27/2016

Tirur

2017-02-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:137/2015

2017-02-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Muhammed Shafi regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No. 34/2017

Tirur

2017-05-08

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

65%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Complaint Withdrawn by Plaintiff

The complainant frequently withdrew the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused under Section 257 Cr.P.C.

Found in 65 cases (65%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence to Support Claim

The complainant failed to provide adequate evidence to prove the issuance or execution of the cheque.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Continuous Absence

The complainant did not appear in court on multiple occasions, leading to the case dismissal.

Found in 8 cases (8%) Low Impact

Failure to Establish Debt Liability

The complainant could not demonstrate that the cheque was issued for debt discharge, resulting in acquittal.

Found in 7 cases (7%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Complaint Withdrawn by Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence to Support Claim

Complainant's Continuous Absence

Failure to Establish Debt Liability

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?