Case Summary
Complainant Ahammed Navab accused Pattath Nissarudheen of committing an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Complainant later sought to withdraw the complaint as the matter was settled between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 257 Crpc
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted under Section 257 Crpc for the offence under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted U/s 257Crpc.
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Not Mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not Mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acquittal of the accused under Section 257 Crpc for the offence under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act.
Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted U/s 257Crpc.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ahammed Navab vs Pattath Nissarudheen regarding Cheque Dishonour
Case Code Year
Case between Ahammed Navab vs Pattath Nissarudheen regarding Cheque Dishonour
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case