Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.103/2012

Case between Mujeeb Rahman. K. K. vs Abdul Rasheed. V. regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri Biju. V. G
Order Date
2014-05-20
Duration
3 years 9 months
Case Code No.
103
Case Closed
Tue, 05/20/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complainant filed a case against the accused for dishonouring a cheque issued towards repayment of borrowed amount. The accused was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment and to pay compensation of Rs.4,50,000 to the complainant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was found guilty of dishonouring a cheque issued towards repayment of a debt, leading to a sentence of 3 months imprisonment and a compensation of Rs.4,50,000 to the complainant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.4,50,000 and 3 months imprisonment
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found guilty of dishonouring a cheque issued towards repayment of a debt, leading to a sentence of 3 months imprisonment and a compensation of Rs.4,50,000 to the complainant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The accused failed to provide a credible explanation or evidence to rebut the complainant's claim of a legally enforceable debt and the issuance of the cheque towards repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On an analysis of the circumstances in favour of the accused and against the accused, I hold a view that the circumstances relied upon by the accused is not sufficient to rebut the presumption available in favour of the complainant.

Judgment Evidence:

On the basis of foregoing discussions and evidence on record, I am of the view that the complainant has successfully established that the accused executed and issued Ext. P1 cheque in discharge of legally enforceable debt of Rs.3,50,000/- to the complainant and that the accused has committed the offence punishable u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the non-payment of amount within statutory period.

Parties Involved

Parties

Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque dated 21/7/2010, Cheque return memo, Postal receipt, Lawyer notice, Bill from Thayyil Gold Palace
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST.
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 06/01/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 05/20/2014 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Tajudheen vs R. Mohammed Shah regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Anwar N.P vs Musthafa and another regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Shahul Hameed vs K Kunjimon regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Subair. C. vs Sulaiman regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Dr. Mohammed Faisal vs Semeer regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won