Case Summary
Complaint filed for cheque dishonour u/s 138 of N.I. Act. Complainant withdrew the complaint leading to accused acquittal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted due to the complainant withdrawing the case.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.
Judgment Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shahul Hameed
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K Kunjimon
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri M.G. Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted due to withdrawal of complaint by complainant
Evidence:
Complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.
Case Code Year
2015
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case