Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:27/2016

Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V B.A, L.B.
Order Date
2017-02-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. filed a complaint against Rajani alleging the commission of an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the accused not guilty and dismissed the complaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint filed against the accused was dismissed due to the lack of process fees and remittance. The accused was found not guilty.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint filed against the accused was dismissed due to the lack of process fees and remittance. The accused was found not guilty.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that no process fees had been deposited and that the complaint was not pursued.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that no process fees has been deposited. No remittance for the complainant even after repeated chances were given.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the complaint is dismissed u/s. 204(4) Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajani
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint against the accused.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju.P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kavitha Sankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The complaint filed by the complainant against the accused was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence the complaint is dismissed u/s. 204(4) Cr.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Chandran vs Sasikala et al regarding cheque dishonour under Negotiable Instruments Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Musthafa vs Nazar Poozhikunnath regarding cheque dishonor
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -11
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M. Abdulkhader Haji vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won