Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:137/2015

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd filed a private complaint against Haneefa. M for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acquitted the accused and canceled his bail bond. The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint due to sufficient grounds.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused and canceled his bail bond. The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint due to sufficient grounds.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is acquitted. u/s. 257 Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haneefa. M
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Private complaint
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Savitha K.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.
Evidence:
the complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Fathima Suhara regarding u/s. 138 of N.I. Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd et al vs Mohammed Faisal. P.K regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate - II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Shaijal Babu vs Abdul Razak. T.K regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won