Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ST No:44/2017

Case between Shaijal Babu vs Abdul Razak. T.K regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act

Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-12-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complaint filed by Shaijal Babu against Abdul Razak T.K for dishonour of cheque. Accused acquitted under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Accused acquitted under S. 255 (1) CrPC for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, accused is acquitted under S. 255 (1) Criminal Procedure Code for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shaijal Babu (41 years) Regal Exports, Kottampara, Edayour amsom desom, Edayoor North P.O, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Abdul Razak. T.K (40 years years) Tippu Samudram, Kaniyar Veettil House, Muthoor, Tirur P.O, Tirur Taluk

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Accused issued this cheque to discharge a liability towards the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document presented without exhibit reference.
Reference:
Document Type: Original Certificate of Importer-Exporter Code
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows complainant as the proprietor of Regal Exports.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the cheque was returned unpaid for 'Funds Insufficient'.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo issued by Federal Bank confirming insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding payment issued by the complainant's lawyer.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.P6(a)
Document Type: Return Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice returned with endorsement that the 'addressee left India'.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document showing accused was abroad during the time the cheque was alleged to be issued.
Reference:
Ext.D1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases