Case Summary
Complainant Kunjimoideen accused Muhammed Haneefa of dishonouring a cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 256(1) of CrPC
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Muhammed Haneefa, was acquitted under Section 256(1) of CrPC for dishonouring a cheque under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s 256(1) Crpc.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunjimoideen
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Haneefa
- Relation
- S/o Moidutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Description:
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunjimoideen vs Muhammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Kunjimoideen vs Muhammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Arrest Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act