Case Summary
Complainant alleges that the accused issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds, leading to a section 138 of N.I. Act case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Guilty - Acquitted
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found not guilty of offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
The complainant did not adduce any evidence to prove his case.
Judgment Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.255(1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.P. Santhosh
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o Madhavan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil Kumar. P.A.
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o Late Achuthan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Statutory notice and supporting documents
Defendants Documents
Not specified
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C. A. Veeramani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Mujeeb Rahman. V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Law Firm
- Tiur
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction / Declaration / Damages
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Recovery of the cheque amount
Evidence:
Complainant did not present evidence, so relief outcome unclear.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.P. Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between V.P. Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case