Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST Case No. 52/2015

Case between Yoonus C. K. vs Majnuvad V. V. regarding cheque dishonour

Court
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju. V. G
Order Date
2015-11-13
Duration
2 years 11 months 1 day
Case Closed
Fri, 11/13/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Yoonus C. K. filed a complaint against Majnuvad V. V. for issuing a cheque with insufficient funds, leading to an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Majnuvad V. V. was found guilty of cheque dishonour and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment with a compensation order of Rs.85,000 to be paid to Yoonus C. K.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.85,000 and 3 months imprisonment
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
Majnuvad V. V. was found guilty of cheque dishonour and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment with a compensation order of Rs.85,000 to be paid to Yoonus C. K.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Yoonus C. K. successfully proved that Majnuvad V. V. issued a cheque towards repayment of a debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Yoonus C. K. successfully proved that Majnuvad V. V. issued a cheque towards repayment of a debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Supporting Evidence
Ext. P5 is the copy of the statement in respect of the account maintained by the complainant with Federal Bank Ltd., Tirur branch. As per Ext.P5, the accused encashed the cheque No.829779 for Rs.5,50,000 on 30.6.2012 from that account.

Judgment Evidence:

On the basis of the foregoing discussions and evidence on record, I am of the view that the complainant has successfully established that the accused executed and issued Ext. P1 cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt of Rs.75,000 to the complainant and that the accused has committed the offence punishable u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the non-payment of the amount within the statutory period.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Yoonus C. K.
Relation
S/o Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Majnuvad V. V.
Relation
S/o Kunju
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.P1 - Cheque, Ext.P2 - Return Memo, Ext.P3 - Lawyer notice, Ext.P4 - Reply notice, Ext.P5 - Account statement, Ext.P6 - Letter from ICICI Bank
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. U. Sainudheen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.P.V. M. Iqbal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Compensation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation order of Rs.85,000 to be paid to the plaintiff
Evidence:
On the basis of the foregoing discussions and evidence on record, I am of the view that the complainant has successfully established that the accused executed and issued Ext. P1 cheque in discharge of a legally enforceable debt of Rs.75,000 to the complainant and that the accused has committed the offence punishable u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the non-payment of the amount within the statutory period.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of cheque issued by the accused
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo showing the return of the cheque due to insufficient funds
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice demanding payment of the cheque amount
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the transaction and cheques encashed
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
ICICI Bank's letter confirming the cheque presentation location
Reference:
Ext.P6

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Issuance of dishonoured cheque
Case Code
Case between Yoonus C. K. vs Majnuvad V. V. regarding cheque dishonour
Case Code Year
Case between Yoonus C. K. vs Majnuvad V. V. regarding cheque dishonour

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 12/12/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/13/2015 - 12:00
From
Sun, 11/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Mon, 11/30/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Rahiyanath vs Nahmarali regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Noushad Ali. K. vs Fasal. A. P regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Abdel Sathar vs C.P. Abdul Hameed regarding Cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Unknown
Case between V.P. Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won