| Niyamam AI

Displaying 231 - 235 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 704/2018

Kollam

2025-10-29

approximately-7 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ravi vs Sathyasheelan et al regarding temporary injunction and property rights

Civil Suit

OS 408/2024

Kollam

2025-10-29

approximately-1 year 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raju. M vs B.Prabhakaran Pillai regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.781/2018

Kollam

2025-10-30

approximately-9 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between B. Chandran vs Shylaja regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.186/2021

Kollam

2025-10-30

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asokan V vs Union of India et al regarding declaration of date of birth and consequential mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 572/2023

Kollam

2025-10-17

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs consistently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims or prove the means of the respondents.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Failures to pay necessary court fees and batta led to dismissals of multiple petitions by plaintiffs.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Frequent dismissals occurred when the petitioners were absent from court hearings, hindering the proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Dismissing cases due to the absence of legal representation for the plaintiffs was a common pattern observed.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?