| Niyamam AI

Displaying 246 - 250 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Punjab National Bank vs Rani.S et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 40/2020

Kollam

2025-10-31

approximately-9 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reghu.K vs Suresh Lawrence regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case

ST.No. 30/2021

Kollam

2025-07-02

approximately-5 years 1 month 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sreedharan vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 471/2021

Kollam

2025-07-02

approximately-3 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Riya Marketing et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1004/2022

Kollam

2025-07-04

approximately-5 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lela G @ Lela Harilal vs S.Venugopal regarding eviction

Eviction Petition

RC(OP) No. 60/2024

Kollam

2025-07-04

approximately-4 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

Judgments were often ruled against plaintiffs due to their absence during hearings.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence showcasing the financial means of the respondents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notice

Plaintiffs failed to properly issue notices to defendants, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?