| Niyamam AI

Displaying 221 - 225 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shaji vs Leelamma et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 179/2025

Kollam

2025-10-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.654/2022

Kollam

2025-10-27

approximately-3 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Anil Kumar. B vs K.S. Baiju regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 708/2019

Kollam

2025-10-27

approximately-6 years 5 months 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Riyaz Ahamad vs Subha Ravikumar regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.715/2015

Kollam

2025-10-27

approximately-10 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Manikandan vs Chandra Babu regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 964/2022

Kollam

2025-10-28

approximately-8 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay batta, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs were unable to provide sufficient evidence regarding financial means or other case-related matters.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or representation.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings, resulting in default judgments.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?