Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.654/2022

Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding realization of money.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 months
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Leelamary filed a suit against defendant Yohannan for realization of money borrowed for her daughter's admission. The plaintiff claims emotional distress and financial loss due to the defendant's actions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed by the court. The plaintiff did not establish proof of right or the alleged threat from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed by the court. The plaintiff did not establish proof of right or the alleged threat from the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove the right over the plaint schedule property and did not establish a potential threat.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove the right over the plaint schedule property and did not establish a potential threat.
Supporting Evidence
The apprehension of plaintiff is not proved. Here, the plaintiff not established that there is a potential threat against her.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leelamary
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o.Joseph P.A
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yohannan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.Pappachan
Plaintiffs Documents
Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gopakumar G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prahladan. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
So the plaintiff is not entitled to perpetual injunction, as sought for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence regarding the extent of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding realization of money.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/27/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won