Case Summary
This case involves a suit filed by Gopakumar for the realization of money against K.S.Abdul Manaf. The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint for non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to fulfill the procedural requirement of remitting the balance court fee.
Plaintiff failed to fulfill the procedural requirement of remitting the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to fulfill the procedural requirement of remitting the balance court fee.
Plaintiff failed to fulfill the procedural requirement of remitting the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. No application seen filed seeking adjournment also.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 (c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopakumar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.S.Abdul Manaf
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thattamala M.Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S.Manoj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 (c) of Civil Procedure Code
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 (c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money