Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.781/2018

Case between Raju. M vs B.Prabhakaran Pillai regarding realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-9 years 11 days
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Raju. M, filed a suit against the defendant, B.Prabhakaran Pillai, for the realization of Rs.3,50,000 that was borrowed and secured by a promissory note. The defendant failed to repay the borrowed amount despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.4,27,000 with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.4,27,000 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.4,27,000 with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence supporting the existence of the promissory note and the loan transaction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence supporting the existence of the promissory note and the loan transaction.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff and defendant, who have known each other for about 20 years, were neighbours. The defendant, facing financial difficulties due to his daughter’s marriage and business, borrowed 3,50,000 from the plaintiff on 05/11/2016, executing a promissory note agreeing to repay it with 12% interest.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,27,000/- (Rupees Four Lakh Twenty Seven Thousand Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets, with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raju. M
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B.Prabhakaran Pillai
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note dated 05.11.2016, Legal Notice dated 20.08.2018, Postal Receipt dated 20.08.2018, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Reply Notice dated 31.08.2018
Defendants Documents
Marriage Invitation Letter, Book of receipt of money

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Niza Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.R.Sajeesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,27,000/- (Rupees Four Lakh Twenty Seven Thousand Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets, with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the loan agreement and the borrower's promise to repay the amount with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice was sent to the defendant demanding repayment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant's response to the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Marriage invitation letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used by the defendant to support his argument in the case.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Book of receipt of money
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
An attempt by the defendant to establish a different narrative about financial transactions.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Provided financial details relevant to the case.
Reference:
X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Raju. M vs B.Prabhakaran Pillai regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Raju. M vs B.Prabhakaran Pillai regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Bijil Sukumaran vs Syam Kumar regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayakumar vs Sunitha Kumari regarding recovery of arrears of rent
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sreedharan Nair.V vs Basheer regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Achu Chand FAB & Fancy Collection et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binu Dev vs Ramanan regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won