Bank

Canara Bank is the Plaintiff represented by its Manager, Athul Mohan. The Defendants are Bindhya.M.Ravi and Raveendran.S., related as daughter and father, respectively, regarding the execution of a decree.

Canara Bank filed an execution petition against Simi.T. and others for enforcement of a decree. The court dismissed the petition for default as the decree holder was absent.

The plaintiffs, Chandrasenan and Sunil Lal, have filed a petition against the SNDP Sakha Yogam No.655 and its members regarding the management of property and financial decisions. They allege that the defendants failed to convene necessary meetings and acted without proper authority.

The case involves Salman Faris as the petitioner challenging an exparte decree against him. The respondents include The South Indian Bank Ltd and two family members of the petitioner.

The Federal Bank Ltd filed a suit for the realisation of money. The matter was settled and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.

N.Sundaresan filed a petition against Indian Bank for a temporary injunction to prevent the bank from recovering an alleged overcharged loan amount. The plaintiff claimed that the bank's demand for Rs.2,19,292 was illegal since he only borrowed Rs.35,992.

The petitioner, Branch Manager of Canara Bank, filed a petition to restore the suit due to lack of action on the part of the petitioner. The court found no steps taken to proceed with the case and dismissed the petition.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit for realization of money. The case was heard on 10.04.2025.

The plaintiff, M/s. Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Remya.S, for the recovery of money due to a loan default. The defendant had taken a loan but failed to make the required repayments.

The plaintiff, Karnataka Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants for defaulting on repayment. The defendants had taken a loan to purchase a car and failed to comply with the repayment terms.