Bank

The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a review petition to restore the suit on file. The respondents appeared before the court but did not file any objections.

The Branch Manager of Canara Bank filed a review petition to restore a suit. The defendants did not appear before the court, and the petition was allowed to restore the suit.

UCO Bank, Kollam Branch is the decree holder seeking execution of a decree against the judgment debtors Shihabudeen and Sajeena. The court dismissed the execution petition for default as the decree holder was absent and failed to comply with the previous order.

The case involves M/s. Canara Bank as the Decree Holder and Shaiju.U. as the Judgment Debtor. The Execution Petition was filed for specific direction, but the Decree Holder was absent and failed to comply with a prior order.

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, who failed to repay despite reminders. The defendants, including the proprietor of the bakery, were given financial assistance under an MSME loan but defaulted on repayment.

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, A.Saeed, for the recovery of a loan amount that was not repaid. The defendant had taken a loan of Rs. 75,000 but failed to make the repayments despite legal notice.

M/s. Indian Bank filed a suit for realization of money against Rasheed.H. and Vahida.R., who defaulted on their G.C.C. loan. The defendants are husband and wife who borrowed a loan for personal use but failed to repay it despite repeated reminders.

The case involves M/s.Canara Bank suing M/s.Achu Chand FAB & Fancy Collection and others for the recovery of money. The suit was dismissed as not pressed on the hearing date.

The Canara Bank filed a suit against Nisha Sebastian and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants, associated as a Joint Liability Group, defaulted on their loan repayment, leading the plaintiff to seek legal relief.

The plaintiff, M/s. Indian Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, Anandavally.B. and Deepthi, for the realization of a loan amount due to the bank. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayment despite multiple notifications from the bank.