Case Summary
Canara Bank filed an execution petition against Simi.T. and others for enforcement of a decree. The court dismissed the petition for default as the decree holder was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
Decree Holder was absent and did not make any representation.
Decree Holder was absent and did not make any representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Simi.T.
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivadasan.K.
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajilal.S.
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- P.Udayabhanu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Judgment Debtors
- Advocate Name
- Vettath.V.Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Simi.T. et al regarding Decree Execution
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Simi.T. et al regarding Decree Execution